PART 1: Masculine Excellence or Misogyny—Is Andrew Tate the Antidote to Rockefeller’s Artificial Insemination of Women's Lib?

The Holy Grail, Magnetism, and the Potential of a New Earth

Recently my neighbor and I took our sons and their friends for a weekend of car camping and a much needed break from the daily struggle to keep our kids off their screens. I was in charge of middle schoolers and my neighbor had 1st graders. Mother Nature had provided the perfect entertainment for all the boys near our campsite—a huge hill of lava rocks that begged to be thrown for the sheer pleasure of watching them shatter into pieces.  

I marveled at how well the boys got along, despite their age difference, as soon as they had a mutual pursuit to conquer the tower of rocks. I especially appreciated that my neighbor was the sort of mother who encouraged “boy” behavior and didn’t scold the kids for throwing rocks, or hold them back from having fun out of exaggerated anxiety over safety.

I assess how well I’ll get along with other mothers by observing how they react to their son’s getting hurt. If a child produces buckets of tears over minor injuries, and his mother matches his drama with her own—making a mad dash for ice, band-aids and coddling—then I know my son won’t have much fun with her child. My boy prefers friends who will push the limits for outdoor adventure, rather than tiptoe through the world afraid of pain.

Fortunately, my neighbor and I agreed we were both raising young men.

One of the 6-year-old boys climbed to the top of the hill of lava rocks, raised a large stone above his head and confidently declared “By the power of Andrew Tate!” as he threw it to the ground.

My son’s friend mockingly laughed at the younger boy and took him aside to admonish him.

“Don’t say that,” he scolded. “You don’t know what you’re talking about and I don’t think the mothers would like to hear you talking about Andrew Tate.”

My son looked a little confused, but then chimed in with half-hearted agreement. The little one hung his head, embarrassed by the older boys.

Until then I did not know that my son was even aware of a character named Andrew Tate. 

All I knew of Tate was that he was a former professional kickboxer and a very popular social media influencer with strong opinions on masculinity. At one time he was the most Googled man on Earth. Right now the mainstream media (MSM) is working hard to cancel him, throwing around words like “toxic masculinity” and “misogynist”.

Tate has been accused of human trafficking by the Romanian government (with some encouragement from the US and Britain) and spent several months in a Romanian prison, awaiting a trial which still has yet to occur.  Alternative media influencers claim the arrest is bogus. When you read the actual charges, they are not technically human trafficking and nothing is mentioned about sexual conduct. The charges are a confusing “word salad” about persuading women to make Tik-Tok videos, and profiting via the Tik-Tok app. Just how Tate is supposed to have made a profit from these women is also a mystery. The women themselves have sworn that they were not coerced by Tate. It’s all fishy, and seems like a familiar playbook for cancelling an influencer.

Apparently, Tucker Carlson was just as curious about Tate and flew to Romania to interview him while he is on house arrest. The 2-hour interview had gone viral by the time we got back from camping.

I watched every minute of it.

At the risk of losing a few readers who’ve already made up their mind about Tate, I’ll say at the outset that it was one of the most compelling interviews on masculinity I’ve ever watched. I wholeheartedly agreed with 99% of what Tate stated, despite his communication style—which is devoid of any nuance. For those who know Tate better than I do, I am not naïve to the possibility that he could be a crude and pompous ass in real life. What I was more interested in discovering was why the Left was so hell-bent on cancelling him.

He speaks in black and white statements, with the assumption that his listeners have enough intelligence to fill in the gray areas. I could immediately see why he’s excellent fodder for the “clip and rip” method the MSM uses to pull partial quotes out of context.

Nevertheless, when you give him time to complete his thoughts—as Tucker Carlson did—it’s easy to see why he’s popular.

Mom’s Crazy Summer School Assignments

In the name of education, I decided to make my son listen to the entire interview this week, with frequent pauses for discussion.

I spread out the 2-hour interview over the course of the week, saving it for car rides. Half-way through my son actually requested that we turn it while he tinkered with Bionicles or his model car, which surprised me.

The conversations which ensued were priceless, and probably some of my best parenting moments this year.  

Why is Andrew Tate So Popular?

Tate is a self-made millionaire and former professional kickboxer who rose to fame years ago when he started preaching what he calls “masculine excellence”. He’s a beefy, good-looking man of mixed-race, raised by a single mother in a rough neighborhood somewhere in Britain. His father was a professional chess player who travelled the world for his employment, and made very little money. Tate has the rags-to-riches street cred to justify his fancy threads and collection of luxury sports cars.

Tate believes men need to raise their standards for what they will tolerate, and what they demand of themselves. He preaches the value of making effort to improve one’s health, work out at the gym, strive to make money, and learn to say “no”. He believes that to deserve a good woman, a man must better himself to be capable of providing for and protecting her (and his family).

One of his more black and white statements, which has gotten him into trouble, is about depression. He doesn’t believe in it. He validates that one can feel depressed or sad, as he did on occasion when he was in prison, but he doesn’t believe in depression as an enduring label to keep one from moving forward in life.  He believes that if you’re feeling depressed you should acknowledge that it’s a temporary feeling and take actions to change your mindset.

He states that “pain and suffering” are just natural components of manhood and real men will muscle through whatever discomforts they’re required to endure if they want to better themselves, provide for their families and excel in the world.  Going to the gym sometimes hurts, but you do it anyway. Getting up early to go to work is sometimes challenging, but you do it anyway.

His most controversial statements are about women.  He asserts that the differences between women and men should be acknowledged and the different roles we play be honored as essential to the proper functioning of a healthy society. 

Is Tate a Misogynist?

When you listen to his complete thoughts, you hear that he has a reverence and respect for women that any female would crave.  He spoke about a woman’s power as uniquely different then a man’s.

I even agreed with him when he said, “Women are more emotional than men. They’re more susceptible to an emotionally led argument, which is why they were the ones who pushed the fear-based propaganda about Covid.”

I had to agree. The term “Karen” was never more popular than during the Pandemic, when the media preyed on the anxiety of mothers to turn many of them into Nazi-like tattle-tales who ruthlessly shamed those who wouldn’t wear their mask over their nose in the grocery store. 

Many parents have shared with me horrible stories of children breaking down in tears at school for being repeatedly shamed and yelled at by female teachers for wanting to take their mask down to breathe during recess.  Fear was so amped among these women that no amount of logic about particle size and the efficacy of masks would penetrate their beliefs.

I didn’t really see the same hysteria among men. Their compliance looked more like a a horse with a broken spirit.

Subdued, and resentfully submissive.

Why was the hysteria so out of control among women?  Because the essence of strong, calming masculine logic was missing during the Pandemic.  Not enough men were standing up to their anxious, misinformed wives. They were not saying “No, Honey, I won’t wear that mask in the car.” They were not saying “No, Honey, I won’t get the shot just so I can keep my job. We’ll figure out some other way to pay the bills.”

By and large, most men cowered.  I saw it every day. When the Feminine Archetype was acting as the Wind, the Masculine Archetype was not acting as the Oak Tree, as we need it to during times of turbulence.

This is why Andrew Tate believes that a chief component of Masculine Excellence is the ability to say “no” when it’s appropriate.

Why is Tate Such a Threat to the Globalist Agenda?

Tate is calling on men to reclaim the masculine traits that are needed to stand up against government over-reach. And in order to do that, he claims a man needs to be strong of mind, strong of body, and financially capable to resist—which many are not today.

When Tucker asks him what he thinks of the Fed’s creation of a Central Bank Digital Currency, Tate says that a CBDC is just another way for the government to keep us in a form of enslavement, dictating when and how we use our income.

“Being financially free is an act of rebellion”, he answers Tucker. He said his position as a millionaire is what enabled him to leave the country when the US went into lockdown, employ others without mandating the vaccine, and help causes he holds dear.  He asserts that the “Matrix”, as he calls the Globalist Elite, want us to be impoverished so we have less power to resist, and less ability to help our neighbors out of an impoverished state.

For a 12-year-old, this interview was a manual for how to become a real-life superhero.

By the middle of the interview my son was asking me if we could buy a set of weights so he could work out. We found a set at second-hand store, and he immediately started pumping iron after breakfast every morning. After a few days he declared to me that he could already see an emerging “six pack” on his skinny little 12-year-old tummy. 

There were other changes in his attitude this week that I knew had come about as a result of listening to Tate. When I joked that he needed to grow up to make money so he could take care of me in my old age, instead of rolling his eyes and groaning, he looked at me with seriousness and said, “Of course, Mom, I’ll do that for you. That’s my job.”  

That sense of honor and duty wasn’t there before.

That same sense of duty was reinforced when I took him to listen to the candidates who are running for election in our district, along with Semi Bird who is running for governor of Washington.  When he heard each candidate’s fighting spirit, and Semi’s declaration that we would take back our rights and reclaim our sovereignty over government tyranny, my child put his phone in his pocket and listened to every word. 

Semi Bird’s speech was a great example of balanced masculinity for my son. Semi is proud of his time serving in the US military just as much as he’s proud of the fact that he cries when he’s moved to joy.

Do you see now why the Left wants to see Tate in jail? Or why Semi is being challenged by the Establishment? Their message is fuel for men who want to be free.  

Why are gender roles so difficult to talk about?

I was first introduced to the power of the polarities between the sexes when I was in my twenties, studying Jewish mysticism.  The core of the teachings centered on the sacred conjunction and balance of the female and male aspects of creation.

The Divine Masculine and Divine Feminine archetypes are fundamental to the organic mechanism of life, whether it be the unfolding of a seed to flower or the unfolding of a new marriage into a healthy family.

The most ancient cultures of the Jews, the Celts, Asia, India and the Native Americans all speak of the sacred principles of the feminine and masculine archetypes.

At its most generalized, the Divine Feminine principle is nurturing and creative, like a womb.  The Divine Masculine principle is directive and productive, like a builder. The Feminine is wild like the wind, and creates with unlimited access to whatever inspires it—especially the power of emotion. It is all potential. The Masculine erects the boundaries around that wild emotion, using the structure of logic and reason to guide it into a form.

The black side of the yin-yang symbol is the Feminine, because it’s the dark womb of unlimited potential. The white side of the yin-yang symbol is the Masculine, which has the power to bring the gestated idea into the light and into form. 

*Note that the black side contains an inner circle of white, and vice versa.

The partnership of balanced opposites applies to the unfolding of anything organic on Earth--families, ideas, businesses and governments.  

The masculine is most driven by a sense of purpose, symbolized by the arrow on its way to its target.

The feminine is most driven by a desire to connect, symbolized by the addition sign.

Together, they make the perfect union and a third concept is born—community.

Divinely Different, Equal and Complimentary

Every human has both masculine and feminine traits, but we’re blessed with more of some than the other according to our gender (usually).  This division of traits creates polarity.  

Polarity creates magnetism.  Magnetism creates attraction and thus, the glue that holds families and societies together through time.

That magnetism--that sacred bond between men and women--is the holy grail.

Literally.

The grail is the cup of life, the womb that holds the fertilized seed.

Divine magnetism is the spark initiated by Infinite Intelligence that Science cannot reproduce in the artificial world.   A.I. cannot pair bond. 

Now, dear Readers, I ask you—if you were a tyrant who intended to force your subjects to worship and obey you without question, the first thing you’d do is figure out how to kill your subject’s will to fight back.

When Chairman Mao, founding member of the Chinese Communist Party, committed the atrocities that established the People’s Republic of China in 1949, the first thing he did to establish dominance was to shave all the heads of the women and girls and force both genders to dress alike. Children were forced to denounce their parents and turn their allegiance to Mao.

He knew that destroying the Holy Grail of family, and reducing the differences between feminine and masculine, would be the only way to kill the Holy Grail and subdue the people.

My dear friend who lived through the arrival of Communist dictator Pol Pot in Cambodia witnessed him use the same methods in the 1970s.

It’s a playbook.

Do you see anything like that happening now in America?  Could Andrew Tate be right when he says that he was thrown in jail because the powers that be see him as a threat to that same agenda?

What Does this Have to Do with Women’s Liberation?

A year ago I saw a video that is now very difficult to find. It was of film director Aaron Russo (now dead) retelling the story of a conversation he had at the home of his friend, Nick Rockefeller. Nick told him that the Rockefeller family had funded the Women’s Liberation movement, artificially inseminating it with propaganda to steer it in the direction that most benefitted the Rockefellers and the other banking families who currently make up the Globalist Elite.

Their goal was two-fold—to push women into the workplace into order to double the amount of taxable wages collected by the IRS, and to further separate children from their parents’ care.

In “Part 2” of this article I will take us on a more hopeful and positive path—a vision of what is possible for our future. What would America be like if the path to equal rights for women had been allowed to unfold organically?  What will our children’s future be if the Divine Feminine and Masculine archetypes are celebrated, along with the commitment we have to equal opportunity for all?

The truth movement that arose from the scamdemic could be the start of the real and authentic liberation for both men and women, where the divine magnetism between the polarities within us will be harnessed to build a New Earth. Maybe men like Andrew Tate, who demand the return of the Divine Masculine, will help us also find our way back to the Divine Feminine.

P.S. My sincerest gratitude to the readers who recently renewed their subscriptions. Every contribution forwards my true purpose to connect humans to their Divine Source.